Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
pfSense Forum
pfSense English Support
»
CARP/VIPs
»
Allowed traffic showing as blocked by non-active Firewall in 2 firewall config
Username:
Password:
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
Pages: [
1
]
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Allowed traffic showing as blocked by non-active Firewall in 2 firewall config (Read 888 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
saxd40
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 6
Allowed traffic showing as blocked by non-active Firewall in 2 firewall config
«
on:
February 24, 2011, 03:38:35 pm »
I have 2 pfSense 1.2.3-RELEASE firewalls set up with CARP. Config:
LAN 172.20.0.0/16
DMZ 172.19.0.0/16
the LAN has full access to initiate connections to the DMZ and everything appears to work fine. I compared the firewall rules on the primary and secondary pfSense boxes and they are identical.
I have "Log packets blocked by the default rule" turned on on both pfsense boxes.
Everything looks fine in the firewall log on the primary pfSense box, but the odd thing I see is that the non-active pfSense box firewall log is showing traffic from the LAN to the DMZ as being blocked by:
Source: 172.20.x.y (LAN)
Destination: 172.19.a.b (DMZ)
@220 block drop in log quick all label "Default deny rule"
Is this some hidden rule that keeps the non-active pfSense box from duplicating the traffic onto the DMZ? Seems like if that was the case there would be a similar rule and weird entries for the WAN interface (which I'm not seeing).
Thanks,
Sam
Logged
saxd40
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 6
Re: Allowed traffic showing as blocked by non-active Firewall in 2 firewall config
«
Reply #1 on:
February 24, 2011, 03:59:13 pm »
Ah, I think I have a better understanding of what is really happening here.
The only IP addresses that are showing up are ones that are for a Microsoft Load Balanced IP with two members. I guessing what is getting blocked are the packets that are viewed as out of order by the non-active based on the fact that the primary firewall has already gotten past the part of the connection setup that a given packet type would be expected.
So sorry for the false-alarm. I just noticed when I went back through the logs that it was only happening on the LB IPs.
The more I'm exposed to this implementation of load balancing the less I like it--unfortunately, we are committed to this at least for the near future.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Go Up
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Administrative
-----------------------------
=> Forum rules
=> Messages from the pfSense Team
=> Feedback
-----------------------------
pfSense English Support
-----------------------------
=> Installation and Upgrades
=> General Questions
=> 2.1 Snapshot Feedback and Problems
=> Post a bounty
===> Completed Bounties
===> Expired/Withdrawn Bounties
=> Hardware
=> Firewalling
=> NAT
=> CARP/VIPs
=> Routing and Multi WAN
=> Traffic Shaping
=> DHCP and DNS
=> IPv6
=> IPsec
=> PPTP
=> PPPoE Server
=> Captive Portal
=> webGUI
=> Wireless
=> SNMP
=> Packages
=> Virtualization installations and techniques
=> OpenVPN
=> Gaming
-----------------------------
Development/Documentation
-----------------------------
=> Documentation
=> Development
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
-----------------------------
International Support
-----------------------------
=> Indonesian
=> Deutsch
=> Español
=> Français
=> Italiano
=> Russian
=> Nederlands
=> Norwegian
=> Portuguese
=> Polish
=> Romanian
=> Swedish
=> Turkish
-----------------------------
Retired
-----------------------------
=> 1.2.3-PRERELEASE-TESTING snapshots - RETIRED
=> 1.2.1-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems-RETIRED
=> 2.0-RC Snapshot Feedback and Problems - RETIRED
=> DNS Server testing area - RETIRED
Loading...