next »

[kevindd992002]

Is this already solved in 2.0? Or will there still be a conflict?

[Nachtfalke]

I think you will use LoadBalancing/Failover:
Not it is not solved. The actual workaround is to double NAT one gateway so that there are different gateways.

[kevindd992002]

Yeah, and double-NATting means you need another router for one of the modems before going into pfsense, right?

[Metu69salemi]

or just use modem in routing mode instead of bridging

[kevindd992002]

Is there a way to do that for the Motorola SB5101 cable modem? I think there's none?

[singerie]

Is there a way to do that for the Motorola SB5101 cable modem? I think there's none?

i don't think so.

[claes_hellgren]

Will it be fixed in the final release of pfSense 2.0?

[Metu69salemi]

Don't going to think so. If I remember it right it depends more likely to source os than pfsense itself.

[cmb]

If I remember it right it depends more likely to source os than pfsense itself.

this. No plans to add this support at this time (though our plans are entirely dependent on what people are willing to pay for, so they can change at any time). Definitely won't be in 2.0, that's coming out next week.

[Metu69salemi]

Definitely won't be in 2.0, that's coming out next week.

Greatly OT, but still. Really good news to hear