Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
+  pfSense Forum
|-+  pfSense English Support» Hardware» 1U build
Username:
Password:
 
 

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 1U build  (Read 1356 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
KM
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« on: December 09, 2012, 10:14:43 am »

As promised here are the specs on my new pfSense build.

Celeron G550 2.6Ghz (SB)
Cheapo Foxconn MB
Scavenged 4GB DDR3 1333Mhz RAM module (1x 4GB) - I can upgrade to 8GB later if I want more.
Dell X3959 (intel) dual port server NIC
Dynatron K2 CPU cooler for 1u case
Scavenged 2.5" 250gb HDD
16x PCIe riser card
iStarUSA 1u case with 220W 80+ PSU
A couple of 40mm fans.
Final cost was about $390 all in. A little on the expensive side but I'm getting a lot of use and fun out of it. I'm using a Netgear GS108E switch as well so I can play around with multiple VLAN configurations. Current services include snort, HVAP, pfBlocker, and nmap.

Logged
matguy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 253


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2012, 11:28:17 am »

Very nice.  How's the noise?
Logged
KM
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2012, 02:27:39 pm »

Quite good actually. When it is going full speed it is a little on the loud side but this application will basically never see that sort of thing so I am quite happy. My phone says about 50db where I sit but that is for the whole rack so its not bad at all. When I get a few spare minutes I'll measure the power usage and post it here.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2012, 02:30:24 pm by KM » Logged
KM
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2012, 12:25:11 pm »

I should probably clarify that last statement. 50DB is for an entire 12U rack that I sit pretty much on top of with 4 computers running. Building a new desk and organizing the office is the next project on the list.
Logged
KM
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2012, 06:12:07 pm »

I don't understand what you mean?
Logged
stephenw10
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5104



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2012, 06:44:44 pm »

Ridiculous number of links in post: Yes.
Only joined today: Yes.
1st post on the forum: Yes.
Barely comprehensible language: Yes.

Conclusion: Spam!  Wink
Logged
chpalmer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 882


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2012, 07:06:10 pm »

Ridiculous number of links in post: Yes.
Only joined today: Yes.
1st post on the forum: Yes.
Barely comprehensible language: Yes.

Conclusion: Spam!  Wink

Yep-    Spambot!


Back on course- Nice Job!  Smiley
Logged
KM
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2012, 07:28:59 pm »

Hilarious. I'm only used to seeing such things on forums with a political bent.
Logged
cmb
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6055


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2012, 07:38:46 pm »

Hilarious. I'm only used to seeing such things on forums with a political bent.

Unfortunately spam bots like every kind of forum out there. The amount of spammers we block is absurd, sometimes upwards of 1000 a day. A handful get through. Reported and deleted that one formerly in this thread.
Logged

pfSense Commercial Support

Paying customers receive support priority and as in depth of assistance as desired through the official commercial support channels at portal.pfsense.org. Forum users receive as much help as time permits.
KM
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2012, 07:54:29 pm »

Not to derail my own thread, but what are your thoughts on ECC ram for a pfsense build?
Logged
matguy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 253


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2012, 08:05:45 pm »

Luckily, pfSense is just transferring data, so any corruption of memory would be transient and possibly picked up at the receiving end.  But, at the same time, you'd rather not have that anyway, plus it could quite likely make your router pretty darn flaky.

Un-detected single bit errors aren't all that common, though, so it'll all depend on your needs.  If this is a very important installation, then, sure.  But, I certainly wouldn't spring for it on a converted desktop if it cost a lot extra (of course, assuming the motherboard supports it.)

Most "server" level equipment probably already has ECC RAM, which, if you're doing an "important" installation, you may already be using.
Logged
KM
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 53


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2012, 09:10:30 pm »

I have heard that single bit flips are more common than.. ugh.. commonly thought.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

 

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 20 queries.