Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
+  pfSense Forum
|-+  pfSense English Support» Traffic Shaping» Which cpu is sufficient for a 100Mb/s symmetric link
Username:
Password:
 
 

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Which cpu is sufficient for a 100Mb/s symmetric link  (Read 1279 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
PRES
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« on: May 23, 2012, 11:23:25 am »

Anybody has experience with shaping a link like this, and is willing to share his is knowledge?

Logged
francisuk22
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 44

:)


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 23, 2012, 12:07:20 pm »

How many users on the network at the sometime?
Logged

Dell GX520 SFF @ 3.0Ghz HT (amd64), 512 RAM, 100 DOWN / 5 UP
6 LAN users on a Cisco SR224 24-port Switch (2 PCs, 1 Wireless AP, 2 Consoles)
PRES
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2012, 06:05:48 am »

around 1000 users,

btw I taught that the amount off user didn't have that many impact as the amount off throughput.

but annyway cheers  Tongue


Logged
francisuk22
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 44

:)


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2012, 05:16:53 pm »

Ahh.  Cheesy

My advise would be getting a quad core CPU if your doing about 1000 users at the sametime as traffic shaping would take some CPU

Francis Smiley
Logged

Dell GX520 SFF @ 3.0Ghz HT (amd64), 512 RAM, 100 DOWN / 5 UP
6 LAN users on a Cisco SR224 24-port Switch (2 PCs, 1 Wireless AP, 2 Consoles)
dreamslacker
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 717


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2012, 07:13:15 pm »

A quad core cpu isn't required.  Even an Atom will push that kind of bandwidth. The number of users doesn't matter so much as the throughput (in both bandwidth and PPS) when considering the CPU.  You may need more RAM (about 2GB will suffice) though.

More importantly, what packages/ features do you intend to run?  Packages like Snort, Squid and HAVP will require more processing power and much more ram.

If you need VPN on that link, then you should look into the newer Core i processors.
Logged
PRES
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2012, 06:52:37 am »

Thanks for the reply,

For now it will only handle traffic shaping.
Little info about deployment,
This deployment will be in a school and we want to use for every user a up and down queue. So the bandwidth is divided by the amount of user, and staff members will get more.

Logged
Eleander
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 18


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 07, 2012, 02:40:12 am »

PRES,

I would reconsider userbased Up-down q's!
Departements will do fine.

And then again, it's the traffic type you gonna shape, not the user q!
Departements then again should be or VLAN'd and/or Subnetted (higher security) so you can wel.... if you have a network that large most of these things are in place!
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

 

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 19 queries.