Netgate SG-1000 microFirewall

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Gentle Joe

Pages: [1]
1
Traffic Shaping / Queues show NaN values, why?
« on: February 11, 2018, 04:03:31 pm »
I'm using traffic shaping.

I have used a few different types, PRIQ works well for voip, but i'm looking to understand and use HFSC more.

In both of these queue schedulers, I see NaN (not a number) in the queue status.

Any idea why? See screen captures enclosed.

2
webGUI / Error editing or adding PPP
« on: February 06, 2018, 10:13:25 pm »
I get this error when editing or adding a PPP interface.

I haven't edited a PPP interface in a long time. Maybe this is a known issue, I did see a similar bug listed.

"Warning: array_merge(): Argument #2 is not an array in /etc/inc/interfaces.inc on line 6664 Catchable fatal error: Argument 4 passed to Form_Select::__construct() must be of the type array, null given, called in /usr/local/www/interfaces_ppps_edit.php on line 507 and defined in /usr/local/www/classes/Form/Select.class.php on line 29 PHP ERROR: Type: 4096, File: /usr/local/www/classes/Form/Select.class.php, Line: 29, Message: Argument 4 passed to Form_Select::__construct() must be of the type array, null given, called in /usr/local/www/interfaces_ppps_edit.php on line 507 and defined"


2.4.3-DEVELOPMENT (amd64)
built on Tue Feb 06 17:39:35 CST 2018
FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p6

3
I have a T-Mobile femtocell as well as a T-Mobile LineLink on my LAN that I want to give priority.

The femtocell is a small low power cell site that allows cell calls, text and data over the internet using the standard cell phone.
The LineLink is like a voip adapter that has a POTS socket and connects over the internet, creates a home phone connection.

I tried to use the wizard - Multiple Lan/Wan, using all defaults and I used the local IP address of the femtocell 192.168.1.101 for now.
I created an alias for both IP address, after I get a single IP working.

I changed it to 'any' protocol. I tried it with any source and also with the source as WAN net, WAN address, and with them as the destination too. See the images.

With my cell phone connected to the femtocell (with the phone's Wifi disabled), I did a speedtest.

I looked on the queues, I saw no Voip traffic at all.   On this page: http://192.168.1.1/status_queues.php

Using PRIQ.


Any tips for me, for what I'm going wrong?


I did do other tests where I used Low/normal/High  for application/protocols using PRIQ, they seemed to work ok and I saw those going into the correct queues.

4
2.4 Development Snapshots / Capture a log on a lockup?
« on: March 31, 2017, 09:27:25 pm »
When pfsense locks up, doesn't respond to telnet/ssh/ping/http/dns anything, I force a reboot via the power/reset button.

Are there any log files (in /var/log) that I can go and look at to see why it locked up?

I look at the system log, it doesn't show anything.

2.4 Beta seems to do this every week or so.

thanks

2.4.0-BETA (amd64)
built on Mon Mar 27 13:20:05 CDT 2017
FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p8
Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D2550 @ 1.86GHz
4 GB ram, 120 GB SATA SSD.
PPPoE,darkstat, openvpn server (no clients when crashed),ntopng (missing the whole month of March)

5
2.4 Development Snapshots / powerd error when configuring new setting
« on: February 08, 2017, 09:42:53 pm »
php-fpm   82404   /system_advanced_misc.php: The command '/usr/sbin/powerd -b hadp -a hadp -n hadp' returned exit code '69', the output was 'powerd: no cpufreq(4) support -- aborting: No such file or directory'

It gives this error when selecting either the None/ACPI or the Intel Core*.

On bootup it gives this.

php-cgi      rc.bootup: The command '/usr/sbin/powerd -b hadp -a hadp -n hadp' returned exit code '69', the output was 'powerd: no cpufreq(4) support -- aborting: No such file or directory'

2.4.0-BETA (amd64)
built on Wed Feb 08 17:43:06 CST 2017
FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p7

Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU D2550 @ 1.86GHz
4 CPUs: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) x 2 hardware threads

I don't see any negative affects from this. I assume I can ignore this?

Pages: [1]