Netgate SG-1000 microFirewall

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - clugo633

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hardware / Re: For Sale: Netgate SG-3100 Pfsense Security Gateway Appliance
« on: February 07, 2018, 08:19:03 pm »
Item sold.  Please close.

2
Hardware / For Sale: Netgate SG-3100 Pfsense Security Gateway Appliance
« on: February 01, 2018, 01:54:49 pm »
For sale is a Netgate SG-3100.  Purchased on 12/12/17.  Works perfectly fine.  No issues.  Just don't need anymore. 

https://store.netgate.com/SG-3100.aspx

Asking $270 plus shipping.  Thanks. 

3
Official pfSense Hardware / Re: Upgrade storage on sg3100
« on: December 30, 2017, 11:30:09 am »
Will do.  Thank you.

4
Official pfSense Hardware / Upgrade storage on sg3100
« on: December 28, 2017, 09:21:48 pm »
Anyone know to upgrade/install m2 SATA on sg3100?

Thanks

5
Official pfSense Hardware / Re: SG-3100-questions
« on: December 28, 2017, 09:19:53 pm »
Thanks for the replies. I disabled Squid and squidguard and then my my available jumped back down to 20% used.    Surfing the web also improved.  I purchased through 3100 for some of the same reasons but it also claimed to be able to handle some of the packages that I installed on it.  Using pfblockerng and suricata must have used my storage as well even though it set to default on how much storage to use.  I'm sure configuration could be some the problem as I'm no expert but I do try experimenting in an effort to learn.  Any input is welcomed.



6
Official pfSense Hardware / Netgate sg3100 & netmap
« on: December 27, 2017, 09:03:52 am »
Does the sg3100 support netmap?  I can't find much online about their opt port which I'm using as my lan port.

Thanks

7
Official pfSense Hardware / SG-3100-questions
« on: December 26, 2017, 09:09:50 pm »
Ive had my 3100 for about a month and for the most part its doing its job well.  However, for the past couple of days Ive been trying various packages; Suricata, squid and squidguard. I abandoned squid and squidguard due to performance issues (the internet was behaving to slow) and suricata wouldnt run due to not enough resources (avail ram, only 2gb on 3100).  I used to run a vm pfsense on a 1u supermicro running an i3 with 16gb of ram..totally overkill but what i had.  Ive sense repurposed that machine as a ubiquity servers to run the controller and NVR.  I could switch back but I want to give the 3100 as much of a chance as possible. 

So I was wondering if anyone else was running squid and suricata on a 3100?  If so, what has been your experience?  Are you using legacy or inline? 

Any else concerned with the low ram amount?  I feel like 4gb should be the min to run these apps well.

Thanks.

8
Hello.  Im a newbie to pfsense and have been doing a ton of reading into the issue I was having.  Below is my setup:

SM X10SLV-Q
i3-4160
8gb Crucial memory
30gb Intel msata

When installing 2.2.2 via USB we would get the blue screen and it would get stuck in "waiting for backend" message.  We disable various setting in the bios with the same outcome.  We tried the same with version 2.2.1 with the same outcome.  It wasn't till we switched from AHCI to IDE that we were able to complete the install. 

Any thoughts?  How will pfsense differ when configure AHCI vs IDE?

Thanks for your help. 

9
Hardware / Re: New build-Drive and NIC recommendations
« on: April 27, 2015, 06:18:54 pm »

10
Hardware / Re: New build-Drive and NIC recommendations
« on: April 27, 2015, 04:59:28 pm »
I was about to order this one:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=9SIA24G1XA5371


Is that too small?  If so, I'll move to SSD because their priced better.

11
Hardware / Re: New build-Drive and NIC recommendations
« on: April 27, 2015, 03:34:44 pm »
Performance was biggest concern.  Thx

12
Hardware / New build-Drive and NIC recommendations
« on: April 27, 2015, 02:08:32 pm »
I'm expecting parts to begin arrive tomorrow for my new pfsense build. 

-X10SLV-Q-O Mini ITX Server Motherboard

-i3-4160 processor
-4gb crucial or hynix memory

What I haven't purchased yet is a drive (msata or ssd) and I'm considering adding a dual nic card. 

I'm looking for recommendations. 

Which is the better drive; msata or ssd? 

Dual NIC card recommendations?

Thanks,

13
Hardware / Re: AMD GX-420 vs Intel Atom
« on: April 23, 2015, 02:19:52 pm »
This is for home use primarily, not business.  More to sure up the home network and tinker with Linux, etc...however, I want it to work well and be sluggish. 

I looked at everything from i3 (AES) to Xeon.  I know the Xeon is for much heavier traffic.  What would be the sweet spot of performance at the right cost?

14
Hardware / Re: AMD GX-420 vs Intel Atom
« on: April 23, 2015, 06:52:01 am »
You think an i3 will be enough to do vm's and pfsense?

15
Hardware / Re: AMD GX-420 vs Intel Atom
« on: April 22, 2015, 06:42:58 pm »
I appreciate the feedback.  I'm considering using the super micro X10SLV-Q and running a vm w pfsense and a Linux box. 

Any suggestions on cpu?

Thx

Pages: [1] 2