Netgate SG-1000 microFirewall

Author Topic: Traffic shaper changes [90% completed, please send money to complete bounty]  (Read 266925 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mrt_ok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #45 on: July 05, 2007, 02:40:11 pm »
Can someone please summerize (maybe you Bill), what the current status is and what the problems are?

I think it would be easier for all to help....

thank you!

Offline sanjay_arora

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #46 on: July 11, 2007, 03:46:16 pm »
Can someone advise if this bounty is still open?

I would like to post an additional 50$ bounty for Wulti-Wan traffic shaping, with individual-WAN traffic-shaping settings alongwith a feature that allows one to add an undefined type of traffic by port or originating/destination IP and create a custom queue for it e.g. one can allocate lower priority for a protocol that has not been specifically defined in gui...say rsync or a lower priority for my software repository server updating its various repos continuously.


With best regards.
Sanjay.

Offline antimatter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #47 on: July 17, 2007, 05:03:33 am »
About the multi-wan, I got a question.

The multi-wan, would have two separate queue for each of the WAN interface, and they would be independent correct?

Is there any way that it could be possible to link them together?  Let's say I have two WAN, and both goes over the same line, so if one WAN eats up 500kbps, that is 500kbps less that will be allocated to the other WAN, is this possible?

afrugone

  • Guest
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #48 on: August 02, 2007, 07:46:35 pm »
Hi,

As asked before, is this bounty still open?, I need this feature and I'll like to post some money, but I didn't see any comment from the bounty leader for a long time.

Regards
Alfredo

afrugone

  • Guest
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #49 on: August 06, 2007, 11:40:38 am »
Could somebody tell me if this bounty is still open

Appreciate very much your comments.

Regards
Alfredo

Offline hoba

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5837
  • Karma: +8/-0
  • What was the problem to this solution again?
    • View Profile
    • pfSense
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #50 on: August 09, 2007, 01:06:19 pm »
This for sure is still a hot topic though not trivial to solve. Maybe we can discuss it during this years hackathon, which will take place in october, to get some things rolling.

afrugone

  • Guest
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #51 on: August 11, 2007, 10:20:43 pm »
Thanks Hoba,

And how can help with it?, I'm not an expert, but I can help testing and with some money, how can I send it?

Regards
Alfredo

Offline joshk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #52 on: September 15, 2007, 08:08:05 pm »
Is multi-WAN traffic shaping still "under consideration"?

Also, is that under consideration for the feature of having a single queue for all outbound traffic? I would be happy enough for separate queues for each line and I feel that that should already be pretty easy to do (just change interface names and limits, reapply all rules)

Offline ermal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3832
  • Karma: +85/-5
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #53 on: November 01, 2007, 05:53:37 am »
Can i ask if the people in pledged in this bounty consider their offer still valid?!


Offline wcoolnet

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #54 on: November 01, 2007, 02:56:03 pm »
I started this thread about a year ago, but have not been keeping track of pfsense. For my original problem I ended up using m0n0wall and that has worked out well enough. I am not as actively involved in the purchase decision process of the company that needed this solution as I was a year ago. If this feature does eventually get implemented into pfsense I will try my best at ponying up the $200 I had originally pledged. Should anyone need to contact me about receiving my pledge please leave a comment on http://blog.wtip.net/

Offline techatdd

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #55 on: November 04, 2007, 05:14:08 am »
I dont only want to renew my offer, I will raise it again. 400$ for Multi-Interface QoS in combination with PPPoE on OPT-Interfaces. Also I raise my bounty for per-IP Traffic Shaping to 200$.

Greetings,
techatdd

afrugone

  • Guest
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #56 on: November 04, 2007, 09:15:34 am »
I'm also highly interested in having traffic shapper running in multiwan, I can offer US$50, I know this is not to much, but is what I can do, and this is for personal use, not for business.

Saludos
Alfredo

Offline tacfit

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 209
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #57 on: December 20, 2007, 02:12:06 pm »
I'll put in 200$ for shaping unrestricted by number of WANs and LANs.

Offline ltning

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #58 on: December 27, 2007, 03:09:29 pm »
Hi,

I'm throwing in $500 on this one. I'm specifically interested in multiple LAN interface support. Wizard support for this is desired, but not required.

I wanted to paypal the money right now, but was advised to wait. ;)

/Eirik

Offline sullrich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5110
  • Karma: +7/-2348
    • View Profile
    • pfSense
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #59 on: December 27, 2007, 05:49:44 pm »
Okay we are nearing completion of a COMPLETE traffic shaper overhaul.

Ermal has done quite a bit of work to overhaul the shaper and make it multiple interface ready, adding back all ALTQ protocols and making it generally easier to edit queues and rules.

So who is still in on this bounty?  The plans are to bring this into HEAD and RELENG_1.   We might be able to make a patch set available for 1.2 AFTER it has been tested in RELENG_1.