Netgate SG-1000 microFirewall

Author Topic: Traffic shaper changes [90% completed, please send money to complete bounty]  (Read 267184 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

afrugone

  • Guest
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #60 on: December 27, 2007, 07:23:40 pm »
I'm still here, but I don't know how to send the money and when

Offline heiko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 663
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Get a load of that!
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #61 on: December 30, 2007, 06:16:42 am »
I will pay 1000 $ for eris solution if a fully stable patch set exists for 1.2

Offline sullrich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5110
  • Karma: +7/-2348
    • View Profile
    • pfSense
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #62 on: December 30, 2007, 05:57:14 pm »
Where is everyone else?   I know there was a lot more folks that committed money.  Ermal has spent a LOT of time on this project and it would be a travesty if he does not get what was promised to the person that did the work.

Offline heiko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 663
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Get a load of that!
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #63 on: December 31, 2007, 07:48:58 pm »
Happy new year, my payment arise, now i will pay 1200 $ for a 1.2 patch set solution.

« Last Edit: January 01, 2008, 05:17:30 am by heiko »

Offline Perry

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1152
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #64 on: January 03, 2008, 08:49:17 am »
100$ on it's way
/Perry
doc.pfsense.org

Offline sullrich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5110
  • Karma: +7/-2348
    • View Profile
    • pfSense
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #65 on: January 03, 2008, 01:39:37 pm »
Thanks to everyone that is coming through with their end of the deal.

Now everyone else, please, please keep your pledge.  I would hate to have to switch the bounty system to a prepaid model where everyone would suffer.


Offline heiko

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 663
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Get a load of that!
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #66 on: January 05, 2008, 01:55:00 pm »
Ups, i have found 200 $, so my payment for a 1.2 fully stable patch set is now 1400 $

Offline sullrich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5110
  • Karma: +7/-2348
    • View Profile
    • pfSense
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #67 on: January 05, 2008, 05:31:05 pm »
Thank you heiko!   Now where is everyone else?

Offline mrt_ok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #68 on: January 06, 2008, 07:25:09 am »
hi all,

i already sent the money via paypal - as noted - and I would be happy to get transparent shaping (bridged mode) working well - for the folks who only want to shape without modifying any routing or ip assignments...nice on mac or ip basis, timed and easy to setup :-)

thomas


afrugone

  • Guest
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #69 on: January 06, 2008, 07:31:30 am »
Hi,

I've never post any money via paypal to a bounty, exists an account or any reference to do it right?

Offline mrt_ok

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #70 on: January 06, 2008, 10:04:52 am »
sure, see bottom of page http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?id=38

thomas

Offline Nil Einne

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 14
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #71 on: January 10, 2008, 01:40:49 am »
Has anyone contacted wcoolnet via his/her blog as he/she said 2 months ago?

Offline sullrich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5110
  • Karma: +7/-2348
    • View Profile
    • pfSense
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #72 on: January 10, 2008, 01:47:30 pm »
Has anyone contacted wcoolnet via his/her blog as he/she said 2 months ago?

I don't think so.  Care to contact them and ask them to tune back in to the thread?

Offline Rich

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 44
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #73 on: January 11, 2008, 08:35:01 pm »
The company I work for may be interested in this. Right now we have a pfsense box with a /24 of ips on 20 mb/s metro e, and a /26 on 6 mb/s 4 bonded t-1's and a managed cisco 3600 series. We recently met with a ccie about a cisco 3845 for the metro e, and implementing bgp.

Would the new shaper changes allow us to shape the connections and allow for one to be much faster than the other? We don't really need load balancing, just failover. Also, could we use the failover capabilities of pfsense instead of a 3845 to completely failover the metro e to the bonded t's? I would much rather use pfsense for everything possible as long as it's very stable like the test box I set up on the metro e and just left there because it worked so well. We would also want to purchase the support because downtime is really big $$$ for us now that we've grown. That's why we need the failover.

Offline ermal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3832
  • Karma: +85/-5
    • View Profile
Re: Traffic shaper changes
« Reply #74 on: January 12, 2008, 03:14:28 am »
The company I work for may be interested in this. Right now we have a pfsense box with a /24 of ips on 20 mb/s metro e, and a /26 on 6 mb/s 4 bonded t-1's and a managed cisco 3600 series. We recently met with a ccie about a cisco 3845 for the metro e, and implementing bgp.

Would the new shaper changes allow us to shape the connections and allow for one to be much faster than the other? We don't really need load balancing, just failover. Also, could we use the failover capabilities of pfsense instead of a 3845 to completely failover the metro e to the bonded t's? I would much rather use pfsense for everything possible as long as it's very stable like the test box I set up on the metro e and just left there because it worked so well. We would also want to purchase the support because downtime is really big $$$ for us now that we've grown. That's why we need the failover.

If "one to be much faster than the other" you mean that the failover is not the same speed as the primary, the answer is a simple yes.