pfSense Gold Subscription

Author Topic: New drivers and em LAGG  (Read 1969 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline maverick_slo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
  • Karma: +37/-2
    • View Profile
New drivers and em LAGG
« on: March 17, 2014, 03:04:16 am »
Hi!

Since new em drivers are out, I can see some strange LAGG error popping out of nowhere...
In/out errors    0/29

There were no errors before these new drivers were applied BUT I can see no other errors on same PHY NIC on WAN interface...
Also all seems to work just fine.

Any idea?

Regards,
M

Offline mais_um

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 238
  • Karma: +4/-0
    • View Profile
Re: New drivers and em LAGG
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2014, 05:43:32 am »
Hi
I don't have LAGG but mu em NIC is "clean":

LAN interface (em1)
Status    up
MAC address    00:15:17
IPv4 address   
Subnet mask IPv4    255.255.252.0
IPv6 Link Local    fe80::1:1%em1    
IPv6 address    2002: 
Subnet mask IPv6    64
Media    1000baseT <full-duplex>
In/out packets    4855015/12727729 (610.37 MB/10.93 GB)
In/out packets (pass)    4855015/12727729 (610.37 MB/10.93 GB)
In/out packets (block)    7065/60 (1.53 MB/9 KB)
In/out errors    0/0
Collisions    0
pfSense:
ASRock -> Wolfdale1333-D667 (2GB TeamElite Ram)
Marvell 88SA8040 Sata to CF(Sandisk 4GB) Controller
NIC's: RTL8100E (Internal ) and Intel® PRO/1000 PT Dual (Intel 82571GB)

Offline maverick_slo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
  • Karma: +37/-2
    • View Profile
Re: New drivers and em LAGG
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2014, 07:55:49 am »
Yeah it happens on LAGG only..
I have 3 other NICS doing just fine with same drivers.

Offline ermal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3832
  • Karma: +85/-5
    • View Profile
Re: New drivers and em LAGG
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2014, 04:07:45 pm »
You running any traffic shaping of shorts there?

Offline maverick_slo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 809
  • Karma: +37/-2
    • View Profile
Re: New drivers and em LAGG
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2014, 02:03:36 am »
Nope.