@stephenw10 said in VTI gateways in 24.03:
Right so via the link directly.
Hmm, so you've uncovered a new wrinkle, but I wonder if that might be due to @OhYeah-0 using the 0.0.0.0/0?
I have yet to roll back to 23.09.1 and look at how the route was loaded. I would assume however that since I am using a /30 transit network, the route would be via the gateway IP I provided; not sure if an interface route would make sense if the user provides a gateway IP.
Under 24.03 I did just add the route via the link & traffic passes as expected.
# route del -net 192.168.3.0/24 192.168.8.2
del net 192.168.3.0: gateway 192.168.8.2
#
# route add -net 192.168.3.0/24 -interface ipsec1
add net 192.168.3.0: gateway ipsec1
#
# netstat -rn4
Routing tables
Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire
127.0.0.1 link#6 UH lo0
192.168.0.2 link#6 UH lo0
192.168.3.0/24 link#9 US ipsec1
192.168.5.0/24 link#3 U igc2
192.168.5.1 link#6 UHS lo0
192.168.8.1 link#6 UHS lo0
192.168.8.2 link#9 UH ipsec1
192.168.10.1 link#6 UH lo0
--Larry