Categories

• TNSR

  Discussions about TNSR

  TNSR Announcements TNSR Feedback Problems Installing or Upgrading TNSR Software

  2 days ago
  432
  Topics
  1.3k
  Posts

  M 2 days ago

  Is there any plans to have TNSR support address-families that support vpnv4/6 (MPLS) and evpn?
  The documentation doesn't state the supported families but i assume ipv4/ipv6 only.

• pfSense® Software

  Discussions about pfSense Software, click a category below

  Messages from the pfSense Team General pfSense Questions Multi-Instance Management Problems Installing or Upgrading pfSense Software Firewalling NAT HA/CARP/VIPs L2/Switching/VLANs Routing and Multi WAN Traffic Shaping DHCP and DNS IPv6 IPsec OpenVPN Captive Portal webGUI Wireless SNMP Documentation Development Gaming Virtualization Hardware Bounties Retired

  30 minutes ago
  119.4k
  Topics
  755.0k
  Posts

  I 30 minutes ago

  @patient0

  Why would the DNS queries go to Edith.lan, they should go to 172.25.50253/4, no?

  Oh sorry that's not what i meant. I meant than when i do a netcat command from a different computer I don't see any DNS packets in wireshark, whereas with my VM i do see this which is odd.

  Where do you connect that laptop to VLAN10, on the unifi switch?

  Yea my laptop is connected via a Unifi AP > Unifi switch > VLAN 10.

  From what interface did you capture these packages?

  From igb.10 aka VLAN 10.

• pfSense Packages

  Discussions about pfSense software packages

  Cache/Proxy IDS/IPS Traffic Monitoring pfBlockerNG UPS Tools ACME FRR Tailscale WireGuard

  about an hour ago
  20.0k
  Topics
  126.6k
  Posts

  M about an hour ago

  After searching for solutions online and here, I need assistance.
  Pretty new to Pf Sense.

  I used this guide to setup:
  https://docs.netgate.com/pfsense/en/latest/recipes/wireguard-ra.html

  I've setup a WG tunnel, can connect to LAN on the other side as a peer.
  Needing to multiple peers to login (perhaps 2-3 at once) to server via RDP, (achieved) and resolve DNS on peer side, (not done).
  The server handles DHCP, Pf Sense is a DHCP relay.

  Have tried no DNS as well as DNS= 192.168.1.3, 1.1.1.1 and just 1.1.1.1 in my WG peer config on the WG Windows app.

  Here's the config:
  [Interface]
  PrivateKey = ***
  ListenPort = 51820
  Address = 192.168.80.2/32
  [Peer]
  PublicKey = ***
  AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/1, 128.0.0.0/1
  Endpoint = ..***:51820
  PersistentKeepalive = 25

  Setup on other side is as follows.

  Netgate 1100 23.05.1 (arm64) On premises Windows server, dns is on 192.168.1.3 on site. Server is on 192.168.1.2 Router in on 192.168.1.1 Have allowed ports 53 for DNS and RDP 3389 too. In peer config on router, have allows DNS server's IP.

  It didn't include adding WG to Interface>Assignments as a 3rd party guide I read suggested.

  Should Static DHCP be ticked (Register DHCP static mappings in the DNS Resolver) in DNS Resolver> General Settings?

  Not familiar with windows server, ( can do the basics) was setup before my time).

• pfSense International Support

  Discuss pfSense in other languages

  Chinese Deutsch Español Français Indonesian Italiano Russian Nederlands Norwegian Portuguese Polish Romanian Swedish Turkish

  about 11 hours ago
  42.5k
  Topics
  266.6k
  Posts

  A about 11 hours ago

  @roggy sim, é possível desde que essa VLAN do seu Wi-Fi seja gerenciada em um interface de VLAN criada no pfSense e também tem que nessa interface da VLAN ativar o Servidor de DHCP do pfSense, e assim ativar no combo box do DHCP Server Deny Unknown Clients a opção Allow known clients from only this interface, e portanto apenas endereços MAC listados em mapeamentos estáticos nesta interface obterão um endereço IP dentro deste escopo/intervalo do Servidor DHCP.

• Official Netgate® Hardware

  Information about hardware available from Netgate

  31 minutes ago
  2.5k
  Topics
  20.0k
  Posts

  M 31 minutes ago

  @Jare-0 said in Another Netgate with storage failure, 6 in total so far:

  FWIW, I carelessly burned through the eMMC on my own 6100.

  I'm all for people taking responsibility for their actions when they should probably know their actions will have adverse consequences and they've been warned or could reasonably figure out what they're about to do is damaging.

  I'm happy with my Netgate products and pfSense. But it's not reasonable to expect people to know better or be responsible for their actions when an ordinary and customary use for a computing device (including documented packages) can run it to failure in barely enough time for the warranty to run out.

  Louis Rossmann would love this.

• Netgate Announcements

  Information about hardware available from Netgate

  Dec 21, 2024, 9:29 AM
  44
  Topics
  211
  Posts

  A Dec 21, 2024, 9:29 AM

  It looks like unified web management could be coming soon. It would be great if it means easier control and management of all web services in one place. Let's see if any companies announce more details about it!

• Off-Topic & Non-Support Discussion

  Feel free to talk about anything and everything here

  Forum Feedback Community Job Board

  about 18 hours ago
  3.5k
  Topics
  18.7k
  Posts

  P about 18 hours ago

  @yuriewcli please don't double post and this is not the right place. But you provided more helpful infos than in the other thread.

  @mods can you merge this with https://forum.netgate.com/topic/196932/smb-two-vlans ?